Tuesday, February 14, 2017

Jane Austen / Quotes



QUOTES
by Jane Austen


Affection

In nine cases out of ten, a woman had better show more affection than she feels.

Engagement

An engaged woman is always more agreeable than a disengaged. She is satisfied with herself. Her cares are over, and she feels that she may exert all her powers of pleasing without suspicion. All is safe with a lady engaged; no harm can be done.

Judgment and Judges

Human nature is so well disposed towards those who are in interesting situations, that a young person, who either marries or dies, is sure of being kindly spoken of.

Men and Women

With men he can be rational and unaffected, but when he has ladies to please, every feature works.

Neighbors

For what do we live, but to make sport for our neighbors, and laugh at them in our turn?

Optimism

Let other pens dwell on guilt and misery.

Reserve

There is safety in reserve, but no attraction. One cannot love a reserved person.



Sylvia Plath / The choice






THE CHOICE
by Sylvia Plath

“I have the choice of being constantly active and happy or introspectively passive and sad. Or I can go mad by ricocheting in between.”




Quotes / Crocodiles


Crocodiles

Don't think there are no crocodiles because the water is calm.

Malayan proverb



Friday, February 10, 2017

A life in Writing / Jonathan Lethem


Jonathan Lethem
I life in writing

Jonathan Lethem: ‘I’ve always thought of myself as a dark writer, but this is utterly different’


The American novelist on writing horror, how Occupy gave capitalism back its name and the thunderbolt that has hit US politics

Paul Laity
Friday 10 February 2017 12.00 GMT



T
he Blot, Jonathan Lethem’s noirish new novel, centres on Alexander Bruno, a suave tuxedo-wearing gambler: “he’d been told he resembled Roger Moore, or the bass player from Duran Duran”. He travels the world, playing high-stakes games, taking rich men’s money in clubs and private dining rooms; such is his reputation and air of “ruined glamour” it is almost a privilege to lose against him. The reader first encounters this “weird sad gorgeous man” travelling to a mansion outside Berlin; halfway through the game that follows, a half-naked woman appears in a zippered leather mask offering tiny sandwiches.

His German opponent calls Bruno a “man of mystery”. During another game, cocaine-fuelled and played in Raffles hotel in Singapore, a woman drapes her arms over his shoulders and stage-whispers: “She told me you looked like James Bond, but I didn’t believe it.” Bruno seems content merely to perform being himself, not to have an interior. Yet Lethem’s hero is, even at the burlesque beginning of this entertaining novel, unlike 007 in at least two obvious ways: first, rather than poker, he plays backgammon; and second, he has begun to suffer a problem with his vision, a blind spot – he calls it “the blot” – and it spells his downfall. On a backgammon board, a “blot” is a piece that stands alone, vulnerable to attack.
Lethem, who is best known for the novels Motherless Brooklyn and The Fortress of Solitude, initially thought of making his protagonist a poker player, but decided it was too much of a cliche. Besides, as Bruno says, “backgammon’s beauty was its candidness. In contrast to poker, there were no hidden cards.” As in poker, the betting involves bullying, but as in chess, what’s on the board is undeniable. All of which played into what Lethem says is his “fascination with the problem of superficiality. All I have of you is your mask, the enactment of you … All I can offer you is the one that I’m wearing.” After Bruno undergoes a major operation that involves rebuilding his handsome, expressionless face, he takes to wearing a medical mask (that is, merely a different kind of mask) at all times.
Lethem is a renowned stylist who turns out funny, exuberant, surprising sentences, and who has a deep love of genre fiction. He reread the novels of Graham Greene when planning the novel – “as I kid I revered him” – and Bruno’s escapades in Singapore have a nicely colonial Greene-ish feel. “He writes about men spiralling into disgrace; it connects to this book,” Lethem says. When we talk in his office at Pomona College, southern California, I ask him if The Blot, which is shorter and less ambitious than some other of his novels, is akin to a Greene “entertainment”.
The answer is complicated. He began the book while on a sabbatical in Berlin – he teaches creative writing – when he was in a very “cleared-out space”, having just finished two big projects. The first was Dissident Gardens, his superb fictional engagement with three generations of leftwing activists in New York: it begins with the American communist party in the 1950s, takes in the 1960s Greenwich Village folk revival and the 1970s Sandinista revolutionary movement, and ends with Occupy. Lethem based it on the experiences of his grandmother and his own upbringing among countercultural radicals in a Brooklyn commune – his mother was a 1960s folk singer who died when he was 13.

“Dissident Gardens had invoked a lot of ghosts,” he says. “This made it most similar, as a writing experience, to The Fortress of Solitude” – a novel that draws on his childhood in a poor neighbourhood of Brooklyn, where he was one of few white kids attending the local school. “I felt I was doing some witnessing.”
The second “giant weight off my back” was his collection of essays, The Ecstasy of Influence, a book that tackles, among other subjects, his college years alongside Donna Tartt and Bret Easton Ellis at Bennington College, Vermont (“Bret stood perfectly for what outraged me at that school, and terrified me, too, the blithe conversion of privilege into artistic fame. It was inconvenient that I liked him.”). It catalogues his passions and influences, from Marvel superheroes to Bob Dylan to Barbara Pym; the bravura title essay, a defence of artistic appropriation, is composed entirely of sentences lifted from other sources. For Lethem that book too was “about legacy and burdens and accounting for myself”.

After all this, The Blot was “a conscious attempt to get back to a more straightforward storytelling”; it is mostly “disburdened of social ethical frameworks”. Even so, he didn’t set out to lighten the mood with an “entertainment”: “it’s simply the book I wanted to write next”. Now that he has so many novels under his belt, and is part of the hip literary establishment – the Colson Whitehead, Michael Chabon, Jennifer Egan generation – it would be “easy to fall in with entrancing myths of my trajectory”. But “there’s no plot”, and he’s always wanted to write different kinds of books: “I’ve been around long enough for people to endure my zigzags, my careening.”
The blot itself is not only a backgammon piece, and what turns out to be a tumour behind Bruno’s face, but stands for “what you can’t see and can’t know. The thing at the centre of your vision – yourself. The mystery of consciousness.” In other words, the blot exists in the “realm of the symbolical or metaphorical”. It’s thus comparable to Lack, the hole in the universe, in his early “boy-meets-girl-meets-void” campus novel As She Climbed Across the Table; and to the magic ring Dylan Ebdus and Mingus Rude discover in The Fortress of Solitude; also to the “chaldron” in his later semi-surrealist novel Chronic City. The symbol “exfoliates”, Lethem says, “it keeps meaning different things – and for me, that’s the gold, that’s what I’m after”. He refers, in a typical cascade of inspirations, to the castle in Kafka, the golden bowl in Henry James and the Hitchcockian object, the MacGuffin, that is both everything and nothing.
In one sense, The Blot enters new territory for its author. Its centrepiece is a wincingly intricate description of the surgery performed on Bruno by a Jimi Hendrix-obsessed California surgeon. There’s a hint, too, that the story ends with the gambler descending into the underworld. “It’s my first horror novel,” he claims. “I like Poe, and creepy Philip K Dick novels and David Cronenberg movies, and I’ve always thought of myself as a dark writer, but this is utterly different.”
In other ways, however, the novel returns to familiar Lethem themes. When Bruno travels to the San Francisco Bay Area for his operation, he is forced to recall his childhood in Berkeley and his absent mother, a countercultural dropout. As a struggling writer, Lethem spent 10 years working in bookshops in the university city (“Berzerkely”, as one character has it), and he uses his local expertise when tackling two other favourite subjects – toxic real estate developers and the hazards of gentrification.

A recuperating Bruno, masked and unmoored, gets mixed up with anarchist protests, in which he joins with Berkeley students. It’s another unfolding of Lethem’s interest in challenging politics, and I ask him about Occupy Wall Street, which he visited and addressed in 2011, two years before the publication of Dissident Gardens. “It might sound ridiculous but it changed my life. I had displaced my own left thinking into the past and it made me realise that was lazy and indulgent … It gave capitalism back its name, so you could be an anti-capitalist in America again. Bernie Sanders was utterly the product of that.”
In Dissident Gardens, Lethem reflects, he was trying to get at “an anti-capitalist form of Americanism”, the idea of “left desire, the hunger for something you can’t see in front of you, the sense that the world is not enough”. Occupy was never “a thing in quarantine, coming from nowhere and then laughably disappearing into nothing … we are walking around changed. Because of what was embodied in that moment, left desire unfroze.”
As a parallel, Lethem mentions the insight of the theorist Laurence Rickels that the election in 2008 of Barack Obama wasn’t, as is sometimes thought, the end of the civil rights era, but the opposite – in the late 60s, the whole question of race was merely frozen, unfinished and unresolved. Obama’s presidency represented its restarting, not least with the rise of Black Lives Matter. The moment of its suspension “was what, as a child in the inner city in the early 70s, I was an intimate witness to,” Lethem continues. “That’s what The Fortress of Solitude deals with.”

The novelist feels that he too absorbed the belief that the issue of race had been taken care of, that the future would be “post-racial”. And yet “African Americans were still the underclass, living in these disastrous quarantines and housing projects”. There was so much left undone, but people decided to pretend all was well. “The cognitive dissonance was immense. It’s why we have such a racist America right now.”
Lethem insists he has no special insight into the Trump phenomenon, though he has been in a “fever to understand”: “I’ll read my way out of this somehow!” He feels it’s important to recognise that Trump represents “not something that just happened, a thunderbolt that broke our reality. The reason it is so vertiginous is that it is an unmasking of things that were gravely wrong on all kinds of levels.”
Jonathan Lethem

“That’s not to say that Trump’s daily behaviour isn’t distractingly creepy, that it’s not a stark contrast to the classy, poised, easy-to-identify-with vibe that we were getting off Obama. But it’s not just a before and after.” Part of any way forward is to look to “the giant unconscious beneath the surface” of the “rational experience of politics and history”. As a writer, Lethem feels he should be an “honest witness, recording my own reactions” to the ongoing administration of the “craven, gold-plated Ponzi-capitalist”. It is no accident that the action of the novel he is currently writing – about a New Yorker pulled to southern California – is set at the moment of Trump’s victory.
Lethem has been teaching at Pomona since 2011. When I bring up Lionel Shriver’s address last year on cultural appropriation, he says his students alerted him to it, and explains carefully why he thinks the tone of her intervention made it “a disaster area”. “The ground she’s claiming is the ground I live on – writing about other people than myself – and I should feel that she bravely fought for who and what I am.” But he “didn’t want to be spoken for” on her terms.
“I hope that if my students chose to pick up The Fortress of Solitude, and were reading the chapters written from the point of view of the [African-American] singer Barrett Rude Jr, they wouldn’t see it as being any different from the extraordinary way that James Baldwin writes about – and from the point of view of – his white characters in Another Country.
“Now,” Lethem continues, “the immediate response to this is: wait a minute, you and Baldwin don’t have equal privilege, so it’s not the same act.” But what is crucial, Lethem insists, is “the ethical freight that comes with my understanding that Baldwin made his gesture from a different place, and then finding it possible to make my gesture anyway”. It’s by no means “a simple thing”; other people’s needs have to be deeply considered. It’s far from “putting on a Mexican hat” (as Shriver did, giving her speech), and “making fun of people … it’s a day-to-day, moment-by-moment, line-by-line” process, “created by love, not created by defiance”. He pauses and says he’s in danger of welling up. “It’s created by humbling yourself.”
Lethem’s predecessor in his Pomona College chair was David Foster Wallace, who killed himself in 2008. “When I got here it was still fresh; colleagues taught with him and were still suffering from the wrenching experience. It was like I was the triage on a still open wound … or a Henry James short story – a great man heavily present in his absence, and you were trying to figure out what his message was for you.”

Being appointed as Foster Wallace’s successor was another indication of Lethem’s growing prestige. It’s many years since he worked in those Berkeley bookshops, a little-known writer producing the kind of spirited pastiche now seen again in the opening of The Blot. As “a middle-aged novelist”, he thinks back to the days when he would excitedly discover a new writer, and read all their novels and essays in rapid succession – “it was like I was skeletonising the body of work; I was the piranhas”. These days, he worries for those admirers or reviewers rushing their way through the entire shelf of his books: under such circumstances, “I wouldn’t want to read all of me”.
• The Blot is published by Jonathan Cape.


Thursday, February 9, 2017

Famous first words / Well begun is half done



SUMMER READING

SUMMER READING; FAMOUS FIRST WORDS: WELL BEGUN IS HALF DONE

In the spirit of summer playfulness, The Book Review asked several writers: What is your favorite opening passage in a work of literature, and why? Some recalled their favorites instantly; others pondered the question for a while before choosing. But all these authors revealed a fondness for other writers' enticements, a willingness to be grabbed and held captive from the start. Elmore Leonard Author of ''Glitz.''
''La Fiesta Brava'' by Barnaby Conrad. ''On August 27, 1947, a multimillionaire and a bull killed each other in Linares, Spain, and plunged an entire nation into deep mourning. The bull's name was Islero, and he was of the miura strain. The man's name was Manolete, and he was the essence of everything Spanish. His story is the embodiment of la fiesta brava.'' It must be my favorite, because it's the only opening passage of a book I can recall and recite word-for-word some 35 years later, and be moved by it. With a simple documentary sound, the passage sets the stage for drama, tragedy, and never fails to give me a chill. Walker Percy Author of ''Lost in the Cosmos.'' My choice is the first sentence of the first novel ever written - and perhaps still the best - ''Don Quixote.'' It goes: ''In a village of La Mancha the name of which I have no desire to recall, there lived not so long ago one of those gentlemen who always have a lance in the rack, an ancient buckler, a skinny nag, and a greyhound for the chase.'' My pleasure derives both from the sense of what Cervantes must have been feeling when he wrote it and from the anticipation of the coming adventures of the Knight of the Mournful Countenance.
Here is Cervantes, a failed writer in his late 50's, who has come to that fateful pass when failure is just that, defeat, or by some mysterious dispensation reverses itself and confers a freedom all its own. ''What the hell,'' one can imagine Cervantes saying to himself, ''I've tried it their way all my life. Now I'll amuse myself. What's to lose?''
And so there comes to life before one's very eyes that marvel of all great literature, the character or characters who, drenched in the particularities of a place and a time, achieve the universal human experience without seeming to - humor but something more, satire and philosophy without one single lapse into that overkill and dead prose to which satirists and philosophers fall prey.
All Cervantes did in this sentence was to show all future novelists and readers what the novelist can do and what the novel is about. Angela Carter Author of ''Nights at the Circus.'' ''Call me Ishmael.'' I should think Melville whooped and hollered with glee when he thought of that. The effect is as if some demented stranger with whom you have made casual eye contact in the street, an ancient mariner perhaps, suddenly grabs your collar and demands: ''Call me Ishmael.'' Why Ishmael? Why not Tom, Dick or Harry? Or Herman? Surely his name is Herman? But no, he wants you to call him Ishmael. He insists on it. And you're hooked. You know this man has a story. You know he is about to mesmerize you with it. And his story is ''Moby-Dick,'' the best novel in the entire world. This Ishmael or Herman or whoever he is turns out to be no half-crazed seafarer but possibly the most rational person ever to live on the Eastern Seaboard. Thomas McGuane Author of ''Something to Be Desired.'' Famous opening passages all seem to deserve their fame even when time gives the prominent ones a Polonian air of wise old stuff. One of my favorites has stayed fresh for years, retaining a special insolence and truth, however loosely applied.
''Only the young have such moments. I don't mean the very young. No. The very young have, properly speaking, no moments.'' - Joseph Conrad, ''The Shadow Line.''
Apart from disparaging youth, always a festive thing, Conrad lights one of his famous smoldering fuses. By the time the thing goes off, we have traveled - while Conrad gradually dissolves into his own pages - from no-moments to excruciating momentousness and beyond; miraculously polishing for another age the chestnut that life is but . . . a moment! The starting line, the deadline, the finish line are all interstices between innocence and experience, and all underline the sumptuousness of mortality. But ''The Shadow Line'' has a navigational air. And the word ''shadow'' is not used accidentally. Frank Herbert Author of ''Chapterhouse: Dune.'' I'm a collector of narrative hooks, and I always hunt for beautiful examples of them. They are the essence of suberb writing. One is from M. F. K. Fisher's ''Consider the Oyster'': ''The oyster leads a dreadful but exciting life.'' I choose it for brevity and because it does what a narrative hook is supposed to do - it gives you the key, the essential of what you're going to read about in a tantalizing way. It grabs you and hauls you bodily into the story. Bobbie Ann Mason Author of ''Shiloh and Other Stories.''
I love the first page of
Nabokov's ''Lolita.'' It starts, ''Lolita, light of my life, fire of my loins. My sin, my soul. Lo-lee-ta: the tip of the tongue taking a trip of three steps down the palate to tap, at three, on the teeth. Lo. Lee. Ta.'' It goes on in that vein and then you get to ''You can always count on a murderer for a fancy prose style.'' The actual beginning of the novel is the ironic foreword by ''John Ray Jr., Ph.D.,'' in which we learn that both Humbert Humbert and Lolita are dead, but that isn't the beginning one remembers. The first chapter, four paragraphs long, evokes the whole sordid story of scheming, professorly Humbert and all-American schoolgirl Dolores Haze. ''She was Lo, plain Lo, in the morning, standing four feet ten in one sock. She was Lola in slacks. She was Dolly at school. She was Dolores on the dotted line. But in my arms she was always Lolita.'' Lolita and Humbert are two of the most unforgettable characters in literature - an ordinary little girl and a man sick with the disease of romanticism. He thought of Dolores Haze as Lolita, a ''nymphet,'' instead of a real little girl in dirty socks. Herman Wouk Author of ''Inside, Outside.'' Opening passage, Genesis 1: ''In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. And God saw the light, that it was good.'' Direction of interest is at the heart of literature, and here in the very first sentence of the book we meet the Protagonist in action. The picture of Creation could not be more forceful and stark. Dramatically, the effect is smashing. We are in the black theater of nonexistence. In an eyeblink the curtain is up, the stage ablaze, for the vast drama of ourselves. And we already know the master theme of the book, the primal giving of form to chaos by a Presence; the enigmatic and still unfathomed great event of our beginnings. Stephen King Author of ''Skeleton Crew.''
''All the King's Men'' by Robert Penn Warren. ''To get there you follow Highway 58 . . . You look up the highway and it is straight for miles . . . with the black line down the center coming at you and at you . . . and the heat dazzles up from the white slab so that only the black line is clear, coming at you . . . and if you don't quit staring at that line and don't take a few deep breaths and slap yourself hard on the back of the neck you'll hypnotize yourself and you'll come to just at the moment when the right front wheel hooks over into the black dirt shoulder off the slab . . . and maybe you'll try to reach to turn off the ignition just as she starts the dive. But you won't make it, of course.'' I like it because it invites the reader in. He is addressed directly with his name, which is always ''you.'' It's a very intimate opening, very welcoming. There's a photographic reality that I respond to. The road he's describing is a negative of what I'm used to -instead of a black road with a white stripe it's a white road with a black stripe. Reynolds Price Author of ''A Palpable God.'' The opening sentence I can quote from memory is a famous stunner - ''Call me Ishmael'' - but most of the novels I return to in affection or need are clandestine in their strategies. They don't so much open as start. They mean to go far on a minimum of wind; and it's their deceptive shyness, their refusal to strut, that wins me. (Commanded to ''Call me Ishmael,'' I'm tempted to irreverent replies - ''Call me anything; just don't call me late to dinner!'') Of living novelists, none has produced a book I admire more than ''A Sport and a Pastime,'' by James Salter. In its peculiar compound of lucid surface and dark interior, it's as nearly perfect as any American fiction I know. But it sidles at the start, in an ostensibly phlegmatic but somehow desperate voice: ''September. It seems these luminous days will never end. The city, which was almost empty during August, now is filling up again. It is being replenished.'' Published in 1961, the novel has often been unavailable but is due back soon. Any reader who's missed it - and who can face an extraordinary (and extraordinarily tender) sexual candor - should repair the omission. Gloria Vanderbilt Author of ''Once Upon a Time.'' ''In the middle of the journey of our life I came to myself in a dark wood where the straight way was lost.'' - ''The Divine Comedy'' by Dante.
This strikes into the center of the dark night of the soul. Unforgettable, haunting, mysterious - the spirit plunges into the abyss. At the same moment it gives a kind of wild hope - a surge of will, a determination to find the road back from darkness into light. Gloria Naylor Author of ''Linden Hills.'' ''Quiet as it's kept, there were no marigolds in the fall of 1941. We thought, at the time, that it was because Pecola was having her father's baby that the marigolds did not grow. A little examination and much less melancholy would have proved to us that our seeds were not the only ones that did not sprout; nobody's did. Not even the gardens fronting the lake showed marigolds that year. . . . We had dropped our seeds in our own little plot of black dirt just as Pecola's father had dropped his seeds in his own plot of black dirt. Our innocence and faith were no more productive than his lust or despair. . . . Cholly Breedlove is dead; our innocence too. The seeds shriveled and died; her baby too.
''There is really nothing more to say - except why. But since why is difficult to handle, one must take refuge in how.''
Each writing seminar I teach begins with having my students read Toni Morrison's ''Bluest Eye.'' I believe that by taking apart the first novel of any great writer, we can see plainly what strategies failed since it is a first work and where the germ of artistic brilliance lies since it is that particular author. With this passage, one of the novel's opening sections, I can demonstrate all the major elements of a writer's art simply through an exegesis of three short paragraphs. While the novel handles a weighty subject - the demoralization of black female beauty in a racist society - it whispers in the mode of minimalist poetry, thus resulting in the least common denominator for all classics: the ability to haunt. It alerts my students to the fact that fiction should be about storytelling, the ''why'' of things is best left to sociologists, the ''how'' is more than enough for writers to tackle, especially beginning writers. Laid out here before them are the plot, the characters, the pervading metaphor, and the voice that will weave them together. One should be able to return to the first sentence of a novel and find the resonances of the entire work. That first sentence is the DNA, spawning the second sentence, the second the third. ''The Bluest Eye'' - wasted beauty, thwarted dreams, and social complicity for it all: ''Quiet as it's kept, there were no marigolds in the fall of 1941.'' Robert Ludlum Author of ''The Aquitaine Progression.'' ''It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness.''
My God, what a grabber! As familiar as this is, the impact is still astonishing. The sweeping use of opposing extremes, the dramatic juxtaposition of times and ages and epochs - one just knows that a giant's at work and an enormous ball of a yarn is about to be unraveled. The author has at once set in motion the forces of storytelling by promising just about everything. A reader can't wait to enter the world of Charles Dickens's ''Tale of Two Cities.'' Judith Rossner Author of ''August.'' ''The small room was warm and moist.'' What I find when I look through books I've loved for wonderful opening lines are words so gripping as to make explanations unnecessary, such as:
''The boy Etzel had a presentiment of evil even before the man wearing a captain's cap turned up.'' ''The Maurizius Case,'' Jakob Wassermann.
''I am writing this book because I understand that 'revelations' are soon to appear about that great man who was once my husband, attacking his character, and my own.'' ''Prisoner of Grace'' Joyce Cary. But always I come back to that opening of infinite promise from a seminal work of my childhood: ''The small room was warm and moist. Furious blasts of thunder made the window-panes rattle and lightning seemed to streak through the room itself. No one had dared say what each was thinking -that this storm, violent even for mid-March, must be an evil omen.''
The woman giving birth in that room dies there, but the baby lives. Her name is Forever Amber, and her creator is Kathleen Winsor.



Wednesday, February 8, 2017

The Enduring Allure of Isabelle Huppert


The Enduring Allure
of Isabelle Huppert



The French actress consistently chooses roles that

are morally complex and sometimes hard to watch.
And yet we can’t bring ourselves to look away.


By RACHEL DONADIONOV. 30, 2016

There are two unexpected orgasms in “Elle,” the latest film by Paul Verhoeven, and both are achieved by Michèle, played by the French actress Isabelle Huppert as only Isabelle Huppert could play her. Michèle is a successful, no-nonsense video-game executive, daughter of a jailed serial-killer father and a sex-obsessed cougar mother, ex-wife of a failed writer, mother to a useless son and, above all, a woman who gains mastery over her rapist by finding her own pleasure in the horrifying act. If there is another actress working today who could have pulled off this role, who could have dignified, deepened and brought humor to it, I can’t think of whom it might be.



But first, let’s be clear: “Elle” does not glorify or justify rape. It does not send the message that victims shouldn’t call the police and should instead invite their rapists over for a family dinner, as Michèle does. The film, a fast-paced, genre-bending comeback for Verhoeven, the Dutch provocateur behind “Basic Instinct” and “RoboCop,” is, above all, a vehicle for Huppert to deploy everything — everything — in her formidable acting arsenal. Susan Sontag, who once called Huppert “a total artist,” said she had never met “an actor more intelligent, or a person more intelligent among actors.” When I saw “Elle,” I understood what she meant

There is something intrinsically European in the murky, morally complicated terrain of “Elle.” Verhoeven had wanted to shoot it in Hollywood, but five or six American actresses turned down the role, probably, he thought, because the film doesn’t turn into a classic revenge narrative. That didn’t concern Huppert, an actress whose characters have dabbled in incest (“Ma Mère”) and sadomasochism, most notably in 2001 in Michael Haneke’s “The Piano Teacher.” (Huppert has been called France’s Meryl Streep for her technical skill, but for all her shape-shifting, Streep’s strongest women have never gone so dark.)

Huppert’s résumé is remarkable: more than 100 films since her debut in 1971, for many of cinema’s most audacious visionaries, including Claude Chabrol, Claire Denis, Curtis Hanson, Hal Hartley and François Ozon. This fall, in addition to “Elle,” Huppert stars in “Things to Come,” a wistful, funny drama by the French director Mia Hansen-Love. She plays Nathalie, a Parisian philosophy teacher whose husband leaves her for a younger woman, whose mother dies, whose publisher won’t reissue her book — and yet, who finds unexpected freedom in all of these losses. Nathalie heads toward the light and Michèle toward the dark, but both roles showcase Huppert’s great ability to derive power from vulnerability.



A Guy Bourdin photograph of the actress in 1989. 
Credit©Estate of Guy Bourdin/Art & Commerc

I met Huppert in the lobby of a hotel in Lyon, where she was shooting “Madame Hyde,” a loose reinterpretation of “Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde” and her fifth film production this year. She was casually dressed, in jeans and a T-shirt, and very slight. To get to her room, we walked — or rather raced, at her rapid clip — up four flights of a wide stone staircase. In the room, she positioned herself on a blood-red divan; even sitting still she exuded energy, like loose electrons spinning around a solid core. We started talking about “Elle,” and she told me her approach to playing Michèle. “I had no understanding of the character as I was doing it,” she said, the movement of her hands releasing a cloud of Chanel No. 5. “But I think that’s the substance that she is made of.” It was by not fully comprehending the character that she was able to avoid making her into a caricature. It worked, she said, because “I’m not sure Michèle decides anything. It’s by instinct, intuition. It’s almost blind.”



Huppert walking in the streets
of Montmartre, Paris, in 1985. 
CreditRobert Doisneau/Rapho

What directors love about Huppert — and she prides herself on being an auteur’s actor — is her ability to convey moral complexity in the most unique ways. After being raped, Michèle eventually unmasks her attacker. When she sees the man the next day, she looks neither agitated nor surprised; she is alert and on her guard, but also calm. As Michèle, and in many other roles, Huppert can transmit self-awareness. She gives the impression of observing herself at the same time that we, the audience, are observing her. “That’s the beauty of it. She’s discovering it as she goes, and is not afraid to feel that,” Verhoeven said when we spoke. “I think there is always a mystery to her acting,” he added. “I have never seen an actor or actress add so much to the movie that was not in the script.” 



Verhoeven said the last scene they shot was one in which Michèle is admonishing a roomful of her video-game company employees, almost all of them younger men. “The orgasmic convulsions,” she complains of a violent sex scene between a monster and a woman, “are way too timid.” As soon as the camera stopped rolling, Huppert collapsed to the floor, writhing as if she were shedding the character like a cocoon. It shocked everyone on set. “I’ve never seen anything like that,” Verhoeven said. “It was so clear that there was an exorcism.”



Photo

Huppert posing for Helmut Newton in Cannes in 1976. Credit©The Helmut Newton Estate/Maconochie Photography

Verhoeven described Huppert as a “pure Brechtian actor,” in that she puts distance between herself and the audience, without trying to seduce it or seek its sympathy. It’s a quality that European directors and audiences have embraced, but which can seem more foreign to Americans. Still, she has done some remarkable work in the United States, most notably in Michael Cimino’s now-cult-classic “Heaven’s Gate” and in David O. Russell’s “I Heart Huckabees,” which could be viewed as the comic answer to her tortured role in “The Piano Teacher.” In one scene, she thrusts Jason Schwartzman’s head into the mud, shortly after she’s told him: “It is inevitable that you are drawn back in to human drama, desire and suffering.” (He then shoves her head in the mud and they have sex on a fallen tree.)


Huppert loves American cinema, but she also knows her sensibility is distinctly French. “Sometimes I see American performances and I say to myself, They’re missing something, a point, just to dare to be nothing,” she said. “A sense of what it means to listen, what it means to have a blank face.”



Photo

ON THE COVER Isabelle Huppert is featured in T’s Dec. 4 Holiday issue.CreditPhotograph by Craig McDean. Styled by Marie-Amélie Sauvé


Or to react with ambiguity rather than with what is expected. She mentioned a scene in “Things to Come,” when her character catches a glimpse of her husband with his new girlfriend out the window of a Paris bus; Huppert, as Nathalie, lets out a surprised laugh. 
I asked Hansen-Love what she thought draws Huppert to the roles she chooses. “Isabelle has this addiction — it’s a form of addiction,” she said. It’s something “we share, and it’s essentially the relationship she has with acting — to throw herself into it completely, to get lost in roles in order to better feel herself alive.” 
Huppert is known for her privacy and reserve — she generally doesn’t talk to the press about anything other than her films — and if there’s a connection between her autobiography and the roles she chooses, that’s something that only she knows. She grew up in a wealthy suburb of Paris, the youngest of five children. Her mother encouraged her to act, and enrolled her in the conservatory when she was 14. Her father manufactured safes, an irony she acknowledged. “All families have their secrets,” she said. “But, yeah, sometimes for Christmas we would get little safes. Like miniature.”
Photo

Ralph Lauren Collection jacket, $3,990, ralphlauren.com. Philosophy di Lorenzo Serafini top, $290, elysewalker.com. Current/Elliott jeans, $258, currentelliott.com. Echo scarf, $49, echodesign.com. Makeup: Diorskin airflash spray foundation in #200 light beige and #201 linen, $62, and Diorific Lipstick in #005 glory, $36, dior.com.CreditPhotograph by Craig McDean. Styled by Marie-Amélie Sauvé

She and her partner, the film producer and director Ronald Chammah, have three children. Their daughter, Lolita Chammah, is an actress now, and Huppert has performed with her in two films. “Our relationship is much stronger than a fiction relationship,” she said. The first time they acted together, “we had a hard time really believing in it. We were laughing. We couldn’t manage to behave like actresses. Then we settled down. We had to.”

I asked Huppert what it was like to come home to her family while playing Medea, the sorceress from Greek mythology who kills her children. She smiled, recalling how she took on the classic role in the Avignon Festival when her youngest son, Angelo, was a toddler, and he confused the term “aidez-moi” — “help me” in French — with “Médée,” the French word for Medea. “That’s rather Freudian,” she said. 

In our conversation, Huppert came most alive when talking about the characters she’s played, and, in particular, the ones that go to very dark places. Roles, she said, do not change her, but she feels them passionately. “I am an actress from the roots of my hair to the tips of my toes,” she said, lifting her fingers to her head, then leaning down to touch her toes in her sandals. “I know exactly what it means to suffer for a character, to hate a character, to love a character. Although as an actress it’s completely different. You don’t suffer the same way the spectator suffers. When you suffer as an actress, you don’t suffer, you have pleasure.”