Showing posts with label Annie Dillard. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Annie Dillard. Show all posts

Thursday, October 22, 2020

The Annie Dillard Show

Annie Dillard during an interview at her home, January 24, 1983. 
Photo by Bob Child


The Annie Dillard Show

In felicitous language, she enables us to see the world afresh. But there is always a distance, a sense of performance.


By Rebecca Tuhus-Dubrow
MAY 18, 2016

F

or an epoch defined by mass attention-deficit disorder, Annie Dillard would seem to be the perfect antidote. Dillard, the author of the Pulitzer Prize–winning Pilgrim at Tinker Creek (1974), is devoted to patience and to presence. “It’s all a matter of keeping my eyes open,” she has declared. She is thoroughly and ecstatically attuned to her surroundings, willing to wait hours for a glimpse of a muskrat. Her words are painstakingly selected and arranged. The contrasts with our screen-tethered, logorrheic selves hardly need to be belabored.




A chapter in Teaching a Stone to Talk (1982), called “Living Like Weasels,” is characteristic of her approach. At a pond near her home in Virginia, Dillard finds herself face to face with a wild weasel. “He was ten inches long, thin as a curve, a muscled ribbon, brown as fruitwood, soft-furred, alert. His face was fierce, small and pointed as a lizard’s; he would have made a good arrowhead.” Such descriptive sentences—as sinewy and vigorous as that weasel—are interspersed with whimsical anecdotes (sometimes seemingly apocryphal). Once, she reports, a man shot an eagle and, examining its carcass, “found the dry skull of a weasel fixed by the jaws to the bird’s throat.” The assumption, she writes, is that “the eagle had pounced on the weasel and the weasel swiveled and bit as instinct taught him, tooth to neck, and nearly won.” Then, every so often, she slips in a more philosophical musing: “The weasel lives in necessity and we live in choice, hating necessity and dying at the last ignobly in its talons.”




Dillard hasn’t written a book since the appearance of her novel The Maytrees in 2007, but now she has curated a new compilation, The Abundance, which includes the weasel essay. Though subtitled Narrative Essays Old and New, the most recent contribution (and apparently the only one not previously published in book form) is a 2002 essay from the literary journal Image. The Abundance is really a kind of greatest-hits collection culled from Dillard’s most famous books: excerpts from Pilgrim and Teaching a Stone to Talk, An American Childhood (1987), and The Writing Life (1989), among others. The pieces range from a brief, powerful account of a total solar eclipse to a long, somewhat cryptic essay that seems to compare attending church with visiting the Arctic. Cynically, the book could be seen as an attempt on the publisher’s part to squeeze some sales out of Dillard’s literary reputation. But it could also be read more generously: as a welcome occasion to discern the themes common to her work over time and to take stock of her legacy.

Friday, August 22, 2014

A book that changed me / Teaching a Stone to Talk made me realise I’m drawn to wild authors



 

A book 

that changed

 me 

Teaching a Stone to Talk made me realise I’m drawn to wild authors


Geoff Dyer
Friday 22 August 2014

As you get older the number of books with a capacity to change you gradually diminishes. If you’re not careful, they just consolidate changes put in place decades earlier. At the time these might have been liberating, but they can easily become ossifying, arthritic. So the temptation was to pick something I read 30 years ago. Or to have gone even further back to books that didn’t so much change as form me. Fortunately, a couple of years ago I rediscovered a writer I had read years before without quite getting. This time around I was completely smitten.


Annie Dillard won the Pulitzer prize for Pilgrim at Tinker Creek in 1975, when she was 29. An account of a year spent in the Roanoke Valley in Virginia, it’s a strange book, highly original but very much of its time: back-to-nature writing with the star-spangled edges of an acid trip. This impression may have been enhanced by the fact that my original copy was one of those Richard Brautigan-era Picadors; in the text itself, however, Dillard deemed it (after Thoreau) a “meteorological journal of the mind”. When I first read Pilgrim, I didn’t quite get it for exactly the reason I would later come to love it: it wasn’t a novel – just a series of ecstatic wonderings, united by a tone and a mind capable of extraordinary attentiveness.