Showing posts with label Shirley Hazzard. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Shirley Hazzard. Show all posts

Friday, August 16, 2019

Discovering two authors’ talents, faults in ‘Greene on Capri’ by Shirley Hazzard


Graham Greene






Discovering two authors’ talents, faults in ‘Greene on Capri’ by Shirley Hazzard

Tuesday, January 3, 2017 1:30am
LIFEA READING LIFE
By Heartwood, Everett Public Library staff



This blog post is prompted by the news that Shirley Hazzard died this past December at age 85.
It’s kind of funny to me that I read this book without ever having read Graham Greene (though he’s long been on my radar, and I’m a fan of the film The Third Man). Funnier still since I’d also not read anything by Shirley Hazzard (her Transit of Venus won a National Book Critics Circle Award in 1980, and The Great Fire won the National Book Award in 2003). But a few years ago, one of my book-talking buddies handed me this book and said I should read it. I must say I was quite taken by the cover, and seeing the book’s slim length, I decided to give it a try.

Wednesday, August 14, 2019

Watch Shirley Hazzard's brilliance in action / Goodbye to one of our greatest novelist


WATCH SHIRLEY HAZZARD’S BRILLIANCE IN ACTION

GOODBYE TO ONE OF OUR GREATEST NOVELISTS

by Emily Temple
December 4, 2016
Shirley Hazzard, much acclaimed Australian-American author—her novel The Transit of Venus won the 1980 National Book Critics Circle Award for fiction, The Great Fire was awarded the 2003 National Book Award for fiction, The Bay of Noon was shortlisted for the Lost Man Booker prize—has died at 85.


Shirley Hazzard, much acclaimed Australian-American author—her novel The Transit of Venus won the 1980 National Book Critics Circle Award for fiction, The Great Fire was awarded the 2003 National Book Award for fiction, The Bay of Noon was shortlisted for the Lost Man Booker prize—has died at 85.



Famously, at the very same National Book Awards ceremony where Hazzard was to be recognized for The Great Fire, Stephen King was given a lifetime achievement award, and in accepting it, gave a fairly aggressive speech about the divide between “popular” and “literary” fiction, championing the former and listing great writers he felt were continually ignored by the people in the room. “What do you think? You get social or academic brownie points for deliberately staying out of touch with your own culture?” King asked. “Never in life, as Capt. Lucky Jack Aubrey would say. And if your only point of reference for Jack Aubrey is the Australian actor, Russell Crowe, shame on you.”

When it came her turn to speak, Hazzard deviated from whatever acceptance speech she had planned to address him:


“I want to say in response to Stephen King that I do not—as I think he a little bit seems to do—I don’t regard literature (which he spoke of perhaps in a slightly pejorative way), I don’t regard the novel, poetry, language as written, I don’t regard it as a competition. It is so vast. We have this marvelous language. We are so lucky that we have a huge audience for that language. If we were writing in high Norwegian, we would be writing in a great ancient language but we would have mostly reindeer for our readers. I’m not sure that that is the ideal outcome. We have this huge language so diverse around the earth that I don’t think giving us a reading list of those who are most read at this moment is much of a satisfaction because we are reading in all the ages, which have been an immense inspiration and love to me and are such an excitement.



I can take one of the ancient poems of our language and feel so excited and moved and even sometimes terrified by it that it seems very immediate to me. I don’t see this as “we should read this or we should read that.” We have mysterious inclinations. We have our own intuitions, our individuality toward what we want to read, and we developed that from childhood. We don’t know why. Nobody can explain it to us.


I think America especially is drowning in explanations and what we need is more questions, not explanations, perhaps, because the explanations are not leading us into good places, at least the official ones that I hear.”


Which is only to say that this woman was brilliant, and dignified, and pretty wonderful. In further celebrating her life, I now present two clips—one of Hazzard reading her own work, and one of her in conversation with Richard Ford. Both are worth your time this week.

Shirley Hazzard in conversation with Richard Ford at the 92nd Street Y on April 30, 2010, punctuated by readings of Hazzard’s work by Annabel Davis-Goff.
In one nice moment, Ford asks her about poetry: “I know it’s horrible to have things that you say be held up to you again after you’ve said them, as though you really meant them—but you said once that you didn’t know how people could live without poetry. … It made me wonder: how do you think people who don’t have poetry actually do live?”
“Well I think about this too. It can’t be forced on people. Now you’ve got to listen to poetry, grabbing them by the lapels or something. Poetry comes in different forms, it can come in mere feeling, I think, people realize within themselves that they have deeper feelings than language always allows them to express. And poetry can save very much the souls of people who feel that way—who feel cut off from a deeper thing within themselves, and having to fit in with much more daily forms of expression.

Also for your viewing pleasure, here is Hazzard reading from her own work—the National Book Award-winning novel The Great Fire—at the 92nd Street Y in November of 2003.

Emily Temple is a senior editor at Lit Hub. Her first novel, The Lightness, will be published by William Morrow in 2020.



Tuesday, July 10, 2018

Shirley Hazzard / Love Story Electrifies Beneath The Silhouette 'Of Venus'

Shirley Hazzard


Shirley Hazzard

Love Story Electrifies Beneath The Silhouette 'Of Venus'

Roxana Robinson's latest book is Sparta.

I fell in love with Shirley Hazzard in 1980, when her great book Transit of Venus came out. I was completely dazzled by the beauty and authority of her writing, and by the effortless way she created this world.

Shirley Hazzard / Americans / Quote



AMERICANS
by Shirley Hazzard

Americans' great and secret fear is that America may turn out to be a phenomenon rather than a civilization.


Monday, July 9, 2018

Shirley Hazzard / The Tragedy / Quote



THE TRAGEDY
by Shirley Hazzard

The tragedy is not that love doesn't last. The tragedy is the love that lasts.


Obituaries / Shirley Hazzard


Shirley Hazzard obituary

Acclaimed novelist, close friend of Graham Greene and critic of the UN

James Campbell
Wed 14 Dec 2016
Shirley Hazzard, who has died aged 85, was a writer of fiction, not poetry, but she had a copious memory for verse, and it is fair to say that a line of Browning, plucked from memory in an Italian cafe in the late 1960s, led to one of the most important friendships of her life. Hazzard was completing the Times crossword while sipping coffee in the piazzetta, the central square on the isle of Capri, one morning, when she recognised a man at the neighbouring table as Graham Greene. In the course of conversation, he began to quote a poem by Browning, but stalled at the last line. Hazzard supplied it (the poem was The Lost Mistress; the line, “Or so very little longer”) and left the cafe.

Lost Man Booker Prize / The Bay of Noon by Shirley Hazzard




LOST MEN BOOKER PRIZE

Looking back at the Lost Booker: The Bay on Noon by Shirley Hazzard

It's hard to know why The Bay of Noon found its way on to the shortlist. She may have written some great books, but this isn't one of them


Sam Jones
Friday 23 April 2010



It's always hard to prove that judges of a literary competition have picked a book because of the reputation of its author rather than its intrinsic worth – but easy to suspect. If I mention Ian McEwan and Amsterdam, I'm sure you'll know what I mean.

It's hard to avoid such speculation with regard to the inclusion of The Bay Of Noon on the Lost Booker shortlist too. Following on from The Transit of Venus and The Great Fire (both winners of several awards, if not the Booker itself), Shirley Hazzard is a writer many take very seriously indeed ("one of the greatest working in English today," according to a quote from Michael Cunningham on the cover of my copy of The Bay Of Noon). And that's the only reason I can imagine a book as inconsequential as this one could have ended up on the shortlist when far better novels haven't.


Set in Naples not long after the end of the second world war, the novel describes the friendship and tangled loves of an Englishwoman called Jenny and two native Neapolitans Gioconda and Gianni. Jenny has been brought to Naples to work in a "big NATO establishment" where she is to do translation and clerical work along with a number of other English girls: "Angelas and Hilarys and Rosemarys who had wanted to get away from Reading or Ruislip or Holland Park… tender, uncherished strokes of pastel."
The trouble is – as Claire Tomalin pointed out in a sharp Observer review back in 1970 – that Jenny is little more than a stroke of pastel herself. Except when she manages to catch jaundice and turn yellow late on in the book, she is singularly colourless. She informs us that she moved to Italy in order to escape an incestuous passion for her brother – but relates it with all the excitement of someone describing a head cold. In Naples meanwhile, she lives vicariously through her friend Giaconda – but we get very little sense of what that means, since Giaconda is herself so thinly sketched out. She has long hair. She lives in an interesting house in a messy bit of Naples. She once wrote a book. Her dad was a lefty. She stays with Gianni even though he's a bully, a womaniser and a bit of a bore. I couldn't tell you much more as there are so few real insights into her personality. Like every other person in the book, you get the impression that if you poked through her papier maché exterior, you'd get nothing but air. Which might be forgivable if she did anything of interest, but aside from a few good bits of back-story about the war there's little more in here than navel gazing and singularly sexless bed-hopping.

There is one character, at least, that does have real life – the city of Naples. The passion that is so lacking in the love stories shines through when Hazzard describes the heat, the warrens of streets, the poverty, the beauty and the strikes among the refuse collectors (that appear to have been as much a problem 60 years ago as they are today). So too does the author's talent. She can trot out nice lines about the long line of time running through this ancient city: "The question 'What is it?' took on, here, an aspect of impertinence; one might only learn what it had successively been." And even better ones about its peculiar charms: "The tourist who comes and sees this shambles, has his camera swiped, is swindled by the taxi drivers and persecuted by old codgers flogging cameos, how can he know all that is just, so to speak, a show of civilities? – the surface pleasantries of a reality which is infinitely worse, unanswerably better?"
But clever as such descriptions are, and although the Naples nostalgia may be heady, they hardly make for a substantial novel. This remains a book that is only really of interest to those keen to track Hazzard's development as a writer. It doesn't deserve to win.