Operation Save the Celebrities: The inner workings of the therapists who help stars lead a ‘normal’ life
But this is not a man dedicated to a simple, iconoclastic hooligan’s deconstruction of the rituals of the couch. Stutz, as even his critics admit, is a serious professional. There’s a method to his (apparent) madness. That is made clear in The Tools, an introductory book written in collaboration with one of his students who has since become another specialist in providing therapy to the Hollywood stars, Barry Michels.
In The Tools, Michels and Stutz explain the (supposed) virtues of destroying the barrier between patient and therapist, as well as their quite controversial “visualizations” technique. The latter consists of the systematic use of a series of “visual therapy tools” (“the life force pyramid”, “the labyrinth”), which serve as metaphors for the psychological processes the patient is facing. Through them, Stutz helps patients to understand and confront their traumas, reducing them to a series of “intuitive and concrete” coordinates.
Some psychologists question the scientific foundation of this methodology, but that doesn’t stop them from recognizing in Stutz a notable capacity for establishing healing emotional ties with those who come to his office. In the Netflix documentary, Hill winds up defining Stutz as a particularly wise and empathetic “friend” who has taught him to reconcile with himself. In one particularly moving movement, the therapist (who was 75 years old at the time) takes a pill for his Parkinson’s and bluntly declares that he feels true friendship and genuine love for Hill, and that he knows those feelings are reciprocal. His words make Hill emotional.
Michels and Stutz may be somewhat atypical cases. The primary characteristic of a true celebrity therapist, according to clients like Gwyneth Paltrow, is secrecy. In theory, these elite professionals offer their services in absolute confidentiality. As such, they maintain a low profile, allowing their fame to precede them in elite circles, their name passed from celebrity to celebrity. If someone explicitly offers their services as a therapist to the stars, it’s likely that they aspire to be one, but that they definitively, are not.
That being said, for every conceivable human activity, there is a corresponding reality show — and celebrity therapy is no exception to the rule. Doctor Siri Sat Nam Singh is among television’s Hollywood shrinks, and has practiced live psychoanalysis (on his program The Therapist) on celebrities like Katy Perry. The singer told him that she’s spent years trying to process her trauma from having grown up amid religious fundamentalists who, among other prejudices, tried to instill in her a profound disgust for the music of Madonna and Marilyn Manson, who they considered agents of the devils.
Singh’s televised sessions seem to stick to the traditional therapist’s manual. He creates a relaxed atmosphere, alternates between circumspect silences and exploratory questions, takes notes and ends sessions with a couple of incisive and insightful observations. His conclusion after a client like Perry? That a celebrity is a human being like any other, and his or her emotional wounds can heal and mend with the right therapy. Even with the cameras trained on them, their sessions broadcasted during prime-time.
Even more questionable are the reality shows featuring Californian addiction specialist Drew Minsky, better known as Dr. Drew. After becoming a minor celebrity on the radio, Minsky took the world by storm with TV series Celebrity Rehabwith Dr. Drewand various related programs. All featured broken toys who needed support in overcoming their harmful habits in order to restart their careers — though critics are right to be suspicious of how helpful televising such support is to the stars in question.
Another therapist who has been accused of less-than-ethical professional practices is the self-proclaimed therapist to the stars Shannon Curry. Curry, a clinical and forensic psychologist, testified in the controversial court case that Johnny Depp brought against Amber Heard three years ago that Heard suffered from severe psychological conditions. Curry, a person described as being “close to Depp,” had examined an unwitting Heard and wound up offering testimony that might leave many potential “star” clients unsettled.
The judge asked Curry if Depp’s lawyers would have called on her to testify if she had detected a mental health condition in Depp rather than in Heard. “I present science regardless of what the science may be,” Curry replied.
No comments:
Post a Comment