Friday, March 31, 2023

The 100 best nonfiction books / No 37 / How to Cook a Wolf by MFK Fisher (1942)

 




The 100 best nonfiction books: No 37 – How to Cook a Wolf by MFK Fisher (1942)

American culinary icon MFK Fisher was one of the first writers to use food as a cultural metaphor, describing the sensual pleasures of the table with elegance and passion

Robert McCrum
Monday 10 October 2016

To WH Auden, in 1963, she was America’s “greatest writer”. The poet declared, “I do not know of anyone in the United States who writes better prose”, a verdict that mixed provocation and tease in a way that would have delighted Mary Frances Kennedy Fisher.


Mary Frances Kennedy Fisher at home in Sonoma, California in 1971:
‘If you have to eat to live, you may as well enjoy it.’
 
Photograph: Richard Drew

The author of more than 25 inimitable books on food (each a highly original macedoine of cooking, travel, and autobiography) MFK Fisher was nothing if not singular, and had been so since childhood, growing up in California, the daughter of Rex Kennedy, the editor-proprietor of a string of small-town newspapers.

Food and writing became her obsession early on. While her father commissioned her to write for him, her mother indulged the young Mary “in a voluptuous riot of things like marshmallows in hot chocolate, thin pastry under the Tuesday hash, rare roast beef on Sunday instead of boiled hen”. Not to be outdone, her father would serve “a local wine, red-ink he called it, with the steak; we ate grilled sweetbreads and skewered kidneys with a daring dash of sherry.”


At the age of 21, Mary married her college sweetheart, Al Fisher, and, like many young Americans between the wars, moved to France, a life she would mythologise in retrospect: “We ate terrines of pate 10 years old under their tight crusts of mildewed fat. We tied napkins under our chins and splashed in great odorous bowls of écrevisses à la nage. We addled our palates with snipes hung so long they fell from their hooks, to be roasted then on cushions of toast softened with the paste of their rotted innards.”

How to Cook a Wol  book cover

Her marriage failed; she had affairs, and was photographed by Man Ray, but always recognised her limits. “I wasn’t so pretty that I didn’t have to do something else,” she said. As a single woman, she “spent hours in my kitchen cooking for people, trying to blast their safe, tidy little lives with a tureen of hot borscht and some garlic-toast and salad, instead of the fruit cocktail, fish, meat, vegetable, salad, dessert and coffee they tuck daintily away seven times a week.” Now she discovered her vocation, which quickly became a passion indistinguishable from the others in her life.

“People ask me,” Fisher once wrote, “why do you write about food, and eating and drinking? Why don’t you write about the struggle for power and security and about love?” This question, she noted, would be levelled like an accusation, “as if I were unfaithful to the honour of my craft”. Her reply was that to say she was hungry, like most other humans, was not enough. “It seems to me that our three basic needs, for food and security and love, are so mixed and mingled and entwined that we cannot straightly think of one without the others. So it happens that when I write of hunger, I am really writing about love and the hunger for it, and warmth and the love of it and the hunger for it.” Never less than deeply sensual, Fisher added, “the warmth and richness and fine reality of hunger satisfied… and it is all one.”

Fisher’s prose was remarkable in quality and quantity. She wrote hundreds of stories for the New Yorker, as well as 15 books of essays and memoir. She produced the best English translation of Brillat-Savarin’s 1825 classic The Physiology of Taste, as well as a novel, a screenplay, a book for children and many travelogues. Other food writers would confine their writing to the recipes or the mundane details of a particular cuisine, but MFK Fisher used food as a metaphor. Inevitably, as she complained in a 1990 interview, her subject matter “caused serious writers and critics to dismiss me for many, many years. It was woman’s stuff, a trifle.” But she remained true to her self, described, in her 1943 volume, as The Gastronomical Me. Her critics eventually caught up. “In a properly run culture,” wrote the New York Times Book Review, “Mary Frances Kennedy Fisher would be recognised as one of the great writers this country has produced in this century.”

Her first book, Serve It Forth (1937), made this declaration: “if you have to eat to live, you may as well enjoy it.” This theme was repeated in Consider the Oyster (1941): “An oyster leads a dreadful but exciting life. Indeed, his chance to live at all is slim, and if he should survive the arrows of his own outrageous fortune and in the two weeks of his carefree youth find a clean smooth place to fix on, the years afterwards are full of stress, passion and danger…”

Fisher’s embrace of the slow, sensual pleasures of the table was matched by her cool acceptance of sudden jeopardy and violence. One critic of How to Cook a Wolf noted “the faintly Gothic perversity that makes Mrs Fisher’s literature unique”. For Fisher, How to Cook a Wolf was “about living as decently as possible with the ration cards and blackouts of World War II”. It was also a poignant farewell to the author’s youthful exuberance:

“There are very few men and women, I suspect, who cooked and marketed their way though the past war without losing for ever some of the nonchalant extravagance of the 1920s. They will feel, until their final days on earth, a kind of culinary caution: butter, no matter how unlimited, is a precious substance; meats, too, and eggs, and all the far brought spices of the world, take on a new significance, having once been so rare.”

It’s in such passages that you can detect the strong affinities between Fisher and her British counterpart, Elizabeth David (No 30 in this series). Even when the wolf was at the door, she was always a fierce advocate of a libertarian approach to cooking and eating. “Now, of all times in our history,” she declares, “we should be using our minds to live gracefully if we live at all.” Fisher hated the tyranny of the American diet:

“In our furious efforts to prove that all men are created equal we encourage our radios, our movies, above all our weekly and monthly magazines, to set up a fantastic ideal in the minds of family cooks, so that everywhere earnest eager women are whipping themselves and their budgets to the bone to provide three ‘balanced’ meals a day for their men and children.”

As well as polemical, How to Cook a Wolf is also subversive. The chapter “How to Catch the Wolf” is a witty assault on the tyranny of “thrift”. And “How to Distribute Your Virtue” is, frankly, plain saucy. To avoid accusations of self-indulgence, Fisher also has chapters such as “How to Boil Water”, “How Not to Boil an Egg” and “How to be Cheerful Through Starving”. Her trademark sensuality is never far away: “How to Be Content With a Vegetable Love”; “How to Have a Sleek Pelt” and “How to Drink to the Wolf”.

The reviews of How to Cook a Wolf described it as “irresistibly seductive”, “a book you can hardly wait to get your teeth into” and “a licence to dream”. It’s hard not to imagine that her critics were really describing MFK Fisher herself who, on the final page of How to Cook a Wolf, celebrated “the pleasures of the flesh”.

Fisher’s credo was to live a full life. She had no time for prudence, especially at the table. In An Alphabet for Gourmets (1949) she wrote: “A complete lack of caution is perhaps one of the true signs of a real gourmet: he has no need for it, being filled as he is with a God-given and intelligently self-cultivated sense of gastronomical freedom. He not only knows from everything admirable he has read that he will not like Irish whiskey with pineapple chilled in honey and vermouth, or a vintage Chambertin with poached lake perch; but every taste bud on both his actual and his spiritual palate wilts in revulsion at such thoughts. He does not serve these combinations, not because he has been told, but because he knows.”

A signature sentence

“For several years before France fell, Paris newspapers as different as Le Temps and L’Intransigeant ran irate and direful letters from old-fashioned chefs predicting that sure as shooting something awful would happen to the whole country unless the young people forgot their new fad for sports and grilled-steak-with-watercress and went back intelligently to the rich cuisine des sauces of their fathers.”

Three to compare

Julia Child: Mastering the Art of French Cooking (1961)
Marcella Hazan: The Classic Italian Cookbook (1973)
Anthony Bourdain: Kitchen Confidential: Adventures in the Culinary Underbelly (2000)

THE GUARDIAN



THE 100 BEST NONFICTION BOOKS OF ALL TIME



Thursday, March 30, 2023

The 100 best nonfiction books / No 36 / Black Boy / A Record of Childhood and Youth by Richard Wright (1945)

Richard Wright


100 best nonfiction books: No 36 – Black Boy: A Record of Childhood and Youth by Richard Wright (1945)



This influential memoir of a rebellious southern boyhood vividly evokes the struggle for African American identity in the decades before civil rights

Robert McCrum
Monday 3 Octuber 2016


Great coming-of-age memoirs have a potency rare in literature, and can be just as influential as great novels. Richard Wright, outstanding in both genres, was an important 20th-century African American writer, renowned for his 1940 novel, Native Son. Together with Langston Hughes and Ralph Ellison, Wright was crucial in forging an authentic literary consciousness for the black community as it struggled to escape decades of oppression after the civil war.

The bestselling Black Boy, published in 1945 (its original title had been Black Confession), explored the background to Native Son, but was also a visceral and unforgettable account of a young black man’s coming of age in the American south in the bitter decades before the civil rights movement.

Full of vivid scenes and arresting vignettes, it begins with four-year-old Richard (“angry, fretful and impatient”) setting fire to the family home, a brilliant opening that establishes young Wright as a fiery protagonist. Indeed, he presents himself throughout Black Boy as a rebel, at odds with both his ailing mother, his faithless, improvident father and tyrannical “Granny”. After the fire, the Wright family headed to Memphis, Tennessee where they lived in “a brick tenement”.


Young Richard goes to school; his father deserts the family and his sons are put into care. Eventually, they move to Arkansas, where Wright broods on “the cultural barrenness of black life”. For him, however, there is not even the consolation of religion. He’s an atheist. In church, when his fellows sing: “Amazing grace, how sweet it sounds”, he is humming under his breath: “A bulldog ran my grandma down.”

Slowly, Wright’s mature character formed itself: “At the age of 12 I had an attitude toward life that was to endure, that was to make me sceptical of everything while seeking everything, tolerant of all and yet critical.”

This lifelong spirit, he writes, “made me love burrowing into psychology, into realistic and naturalistic fiction and art, into those whirlpools of politics that had the power to claim the whole of men’s souls.”

Thus driven, and to escape the shocking racism of the south, it becomes his ambition to head north to Chicago as soon as he can afford the trip. But first, he must start out in life as a young black man in Memphis.

The first half of Wright’s “confession” is set exclusively in the south; the second part, describing his Chicago experiences, entitled The Horror and the Glory, was originally part of a longer book with the working title American Hunger. For various commercial considerations, Wright’s publishers requested that he focus on his Mississippi childhood and drop the final (Chicago) chapters. American Hunger became Black Boy, and would not be published with all parts fully restored until 1991, when the Library of America issued Black Boy (American Hunger).

The British, Vintage edition, though incomplete, is faithful to the 1945 edition. It subtly mythologises Wright’s African American upbringing and fearlessly confronts southern racism. For Wright, coming of age was all to do with claiming and celebrating his identity as a black man. The south, he declared, in a fierce passage, had only allowed him “to be natural, to be real, to be myself” through a negative form of self-expression, “in rejection, rebellion, and aggression”. He continues:

Richard Wright.
‘Men should be able to confront other men without fear or shame’: Richard Wright.

The white south said that it knew ‘niggers’, and I was what the white south called a ‘nigger’. Well, the white south had never known me – never known what I thought, what I felt. The white south said I had a ‘place’ in life. Well, I had never felt my ‘place’; or, rather, my deepest instincts had always made me reject the ‘place’ to which the white south had assigned me. It had never occurred to me that I was in any way an inferior being.

As a youngster in small-town Jackson, Wright knew only too well what it meant to be a “nigger”, a second-class citizen. He worked as a porter in a clothing store; next he worked for an optician; then he moved to a drugstore, sweeping the sidewalk. But he had a fundamental problem. He “could not make subservience an automatic part of my behaviour”.

Finally, in November 1925, he arrived back in Memphis. This was not Chicago (a journey he could not yet afford), but it was a start. He began to read, educating himself by studying the Memphis Commercial Appeal. Here, he stumbled on the work of HL Mencken, and had his Damascene moment:

Yes, this man was fighting, fighting with words. He was using words as a weapon, using them as one would use a club. Could words be weapons?

Indeed they could. Better still, Mencken was introducing the young writer to a new world: Spinoza, Gustave Flaubert, Tolstoy, Mark Twain, Thomas Hardy, TS Eliot, and many more. “Were these men real? And how did one pronounce their names?” Wright was hooked. Soon after this, he set off for Chicago:

I was leaving without a qualm, without a single backward glance. The face of the south I had known was hostile and forbidding, and yet out of all the conflicts and the curses… I had somehow gotten the idea that life could be different, could be lived in a fuller and richer manner... If I could meet enough of a different life, then, perhaps, gradually and slowly I might learn who I was, what I might be.

Wright’s closing words evoke the rhetoric of the civil rights movement, making a surprising and unexpected link between himself and Martin Luther King. He has, he writes, “a hazy notion that life could be lived with dignity, that men should be able to confront other men without fear or shame, and that if men were lucky in their living on earth they might win some redeeming meaning for their having struggled here beneath the stars.”

A signature sentence

“A quarter of a century was to elapse between the time when I saw my father sitting with the strange woman and the time when I was to see him again, standing alone upon the red clay of a Mississippi plantation, a share-cropper, clad in ragged overalls, holding a muddy hoe in his gnarled, veined hands – a quarter of a century during which my mind and consciousness had become so greatly and violently altered that when I tried to talk to him I realised that, though ties of blood made us kin, though I could see a shadow of my face in his face, though there were echoes of my voice in his voice, we were forever strangers, speaking a different language, living on vastly different planes of reality.” (page 32)

Three to compare

Ralph Ellison: Invisible Man (1952)
James BaldwinNotes of a Native Son (1955)
Malcolm X (with Alex Haley): The Autobiography of Malcolm X (1965)

Black Boy is published by Vintage (£9.99).

THE GUARDIAN






THE 100 BEST NONFICTION BOOKS OF ALL TIME